Scientific journal The Pedagogical Process: Theory and Practice

Abstract

The article is devoted to the illustration of the theoretical and methodological foundations of development facilitative abilities of the future psychologists. It is founded the topicality of the future psychologists’ training, oriented on the basic ideas of humanistic paradigm, the necessity to organize favorable conditions for the development of his abilities.

On the base of the realized theoretical analysis was made an attempt to define the concept facilitative abilities of the future psychologist as integrated combination of emotional, cognitive, behavioral and volitional formations which is revealed in the ability to provide its own efficient functioning, formation and development, and promote the full development of another person.

It is generalized that most researchers refer to facilitative abilities the ability to be yourself (genuineness, sincerity and congruence); ability of self-esteem and self-understanding, respect and understanding of others; the ability to help and support the approval, adoption; trust, sympathetic understanding; the ability to organize conditions for personal development; the ability to organize a special microclimate in the group.

It is determined that the development of the facilitative abilities of the future psychologists is impossible outside of the facilitative environment, in which the self-designing, professional and personal student’s formation directly related to self-development and self-improvement of the teacher-facilitator. One of the most important conditions that provide the facilitation of the environment is subject-subjective (dialogic) interpersonal relationship between teacher-facilitator and student.

Prospects for further research we see in foundation theoretical model of future psychologist’s facilitative activity and developing procedural and methodological apparatus psychological monitoring its development.

Keywords:  ability to facilitation; environmentof facilitation;  facilitation;  facilitative ability;  facilitator;  humanistic paradigm of education.

References

1. Berulava G. A. (2003). Metodologicheskie osnovy dejatel'nosti prakticheskogo psihologa [Fundamentals of methodological activities Applied Psychologist]. M.: Vysshaja shkola, 64 (rus).
2. Bratchenko S. L. (2001). Ekzistencial'naja psihologija glubinnogo obshhenija [Existential psychology of deep communication]. M: Smysl, 197 (rus).
3. Hutsalo E. U. (2006). T'yutors'ki zanyattya z psykholohiyi yak praktychna humanizatsiya osvity [Tutor training with practical psychology as a humanizing education]. Available at: http://conf.vntu.edu.ua/humed/2006/txt/06geupgo.php (ukr).
4. Kazanzhy M. Y. (2006). Psykholohichni osoblyvosti fasylyatyvnosti yak vlastyvosti osobystosti [Psychological characteristics fasylyatyvnosti as individual properties]: Extended abstract of candidate’s: 19.00.01. Odessa, 20 (ukr).
5. Kondrashykhina O. O. (2004). Formuvannya zdatnosti do fasylitatsiynykh vplyviv u maybutnikh praktychnykh psykholohiv [The formation ability to facilitation influence future psychologists]: Extended abstract of candidate’s: 19.00.07. Kyiv, 19 (ukr).
6. Lushin P. V. (2005). Lichnostnye izmenenija kak process: teorija i praktika [Personal changes as a process: theory and practice]. Odessa: Aspekt, 334 (rus).
7. Radchuk H. K. (2014) Aksiopsykholohiya vyshchoyi shkoly: monohrafiya [Aksiopsychologyof  higher education: monograph]. Ternopil': TNPU im. V. Hnatyuka, 380 (ukr).
8. Rodzhers K. (2001). Klientocentrirovannyj / chelovekocentrirovannyj podhod v psihoterapii [Client-centered / person-centered approach in psychotherapy]. Voprosy psihologii, №2, 48-58 (rus).
9. Rodzhers K., D. Frejberg. (2002). Svoboda uchit'sja [The Freedom to learn]. M.: Smysl, 527 (rus).
10. Savchyn M. (2016). Zdatnosti osobystosti: monrohrafiya [Ability personality: Monograph]. K.: VTs «Akademiya», 288 (ukr).
11. Thorne B. Carl Rogers / Brian Thorne & Pete Sanders (2013). SAGE Publications Ltd, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446289051.n5 (eng).