Page 9 of 26
Pavliuk Roman
ORCID iD 0000-0002-8957-6158
PhD (Pedagogy), Assistant Professor, Deputy Director for Scientific-Methodical and Educational Affairs of Institute of Human Sciences, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University, 18/2 Ihor Shamo Blvd, 02154 Kyiv, Ukraine
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.  

Kohut Iryna
ORCID iD 0000-0002-0856-7074
PhD (Pedagogy), Head of Innovation and International Relations Department, V. G. Korolenko Poltava National Pedagogical University, 2 Ostrogradskyi Str., 36003, Poltava, Ukraine
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.


MEANS OF SCIENTIFIC COMMUNICATION IN FORMING RESEARCH COMPETENCE OF FUTURE PSYCHOLOGIST
https://doi.org/10.28925/2078-1687.2019.3-4.5966

The article presents modern means of scientific communication in forming research competence of the future psychologist. Based on the study of modern research approaches to the development of scientific communication, the use of scientific communication in the process of forming the research competence of the future psychologist is presented. On the basis of theoretical study of the material, the research of the development of scientific communication of future applicants of the second (Master’s) level of higher education in the process of the project assignment in the discipline «Professional foreign language communication» is presented. The peculiarities of the formation of research competence and usage of scientific communication by future psychologists are determined. The study of the ability to use scientific communication was performed by the following indicators: 1) the ability to justify the purpose of the research problem, 2) the ability to describe the stages of solving the scientific problem, 3) understanding of research data (digital and visual), 4) ability to substantiate findings from scientific research, 5) ability to present the results of the study, logically justify them. In addition to examining the ability to use scientific communication during project presentation, each student was asked a questionnaire with questions designed to assess his or her personal ability to use scientific communication during project preparation and presentation. As a result of our research, it was determined that future psychologists have no significant experience in scientific communication, in particular in the process of presentation and discussion of scientific research.  On the other hand, working in the course of your own research as a form of scientific communication does not cause such extraordinary difficulties for future psychologists.
Key words: means of scientific communication; project activity; research competence; scientific communication.




References

  • Pavliuk, R. A. (2017). Sovremennye internet-metody nauchnoj i nauchno-issledovatelskoj deyatelnosti [Modern Internet methods of scientific and research activities]. News of the Gomel State University named after F. Skorina, 2 (101), 35–39 (rus).

  • Pavliuk, R. О. (2019). Profesijne spilkuvannya inozemnoyu movoyu (5 kurs, SR, SP, MOSP, KO, PP, denna). Elektronnij navchalnij kurs [Professional foreign language communication (5 course, СР, СП, МОСП, КО, ПП, full time dep.). E-Learning]. Retrieved from https://elearning.kubg.edu.ua/course/ view.php?id=22148 (ukr).

  • Surmin, Yu. P. (2006). Majsternya vchenogo [Scientist’s workshop]. Kyiv: Consortium from management education in Ukraine (ukr).

  • Ates, O., & Eryilmaz, A. (2011). Effectiveness of hands-on and minds-on activities on students’ achievement and attitudes towards physics. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 12 (1), 1–22 (eng).

  • Aysha, D., Mason, S. (2016). A programme-wide training framework to facilitate scientific communication skills development amongst biological sciences master’s students. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 40 (4), 543–567. DOI: 10.1080/0309877X.2014.1000276 (eng).

  • D’Souza, B. (2019). Scientific communication in the 21st century: Tweeting, Facebook Likes, and everything in-between. Science editing, 6 (1), 64–68 (eng).

  • Hanel, Р. H. P., Mehler, D. M. A. (2019). Beyond reporting statistical significance: Identifying informative effect sizes to improve scientific communication. Public understanding of science, 28 (4), 468–485. DOI: 10.1177/0963662519834193 (eng).

  • Kobylarek, A. (2017). Scientific communication. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 8 (2), 5–8. DOI: 10.15503/jecs20172.5.8 (eng).

  • Nielsen L. H., Jørgensen N. T., Jantzen K. & Bjerg S. (2006). Credibility of Science Communication. An Exploratory Study of Press Releases in Astronomy. Roskilde, Denmark: Roskilde University (eng).

  • Rodriguez-Bravo, B., Nicholas, D. (2019). Reputation and scientific communication: Early career researchers in Spain. Profesional de la informacion, 28 (2). DOI: 10.3145/epi.2019.mar.03 (eng).