Palchykova O. CRITERIA AND PARAMETERS OF FORMATION OF STUDENTS-PHILOLOGISTS’ CROSS-CULTURAL COMPETENCE

Palchykova Oleksandra, PhD (Pedagogy), Senior Lecturer of English Philology Department, Kryvyi Rih State Pedagogical University, 54 Haharin Ave, 50086 Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Abstract

The article considers criterion-parametrical aspects of formedness of students-philologists’ cross-cultural competence. There four criteria of formedness of students-philologists’ cross-cultural competence are established as: motivational and axiological, cognitive, operational, behavioural and activity. The main parameters of motivational and axiological criterion are: formedness of cognitive, professional and social motives, according to which one becomes aware of the significance of the material studied and possible ways of its application; positive / neutral / negative attitude to cultural discrepancies; estimation of other culture (following / ignoring stereotypes or prejudices). Cognitive criterion involves: knowledge of phonetic, lexical, grammar material, culture-specific units of native and foreign languages; formedness of monological and dialogical skills on definite topics; sociocultural material acquisition. The key parameters of operational criterion are: ability to use culture-specific units and units of non-verbal communication, which comply with communicative situation; skillful use of lexical units and grammatical structures pursuant to context; ability to organize dialogue / monologue in alignment with the norms of everyday, learning, professional activities. In terms of behavioral and activity criterion such parameters are considered as: restraint in judgements; ability to control one’s behavior; ability to analyze divergent positions before making a final decision.

 In conformance with the criteria and parameters determined there are four levels of cross-cultural competence specified: elementary, intermediate, upper-intermediate, advanced.

 Key words: cross-cultural competence; criteria, parameters, levels of cross-cultural competence formation; students-philologists.

  References

 Babanskij, Ju. K. (1982). Optimizacija uchebno-vospitatel’nogo processa: Metodicheskie osnovy [Optimization of educational and nurturing process: Methodical basics]. Moscow, Russia: Prosveshhenie (rus).

 Barabanshhikov, A. V., & Derjugin, N. I. (1995). Voenno-pedagogicheskaja diagnostika: teorija, opyt, problemy. [Military-pedagogical diagnostics: theоry, experience, problems]. Moscow, Russia: GAVS (rus).

 Belikov, V. A. (2004). Filosofija obrazovanija lichnosti. Dejatel’nostnyj aspekt [Philosophy of personality’s education. Activity aspect]. Moscow, Russia: Vlados (rus).

 Bolshoj tolkovyj psihologicheskij slovar [Unabridged Psychology Definition Dictionary]. Moscow, Russia: Veche, 2003. Vol. 1 (rus).

 Velykyi tlumachnyi slovnyk suchasnoi ukrainskoi movy [Unabridged Definition Dictionary of the Modern Ukrainian Language]. Kyiv–Irpin, Ukraine: Perun, 2004 (ukr).

 Vergasov, V. M. (1985). Aktivizacija poznavatelnoj dejatelnosti v vysshej shkole [Activation of cognitive activity at high school]. Kyiv, Ukraine: Vysshaja shkola (rus).

 Gurjanova, T. Ju. (2008). Formirovanie polikul’turnoj kompetentnosti studentov ssuzov (na materiale obuchenija inostrannomu jazyku) [Formation of policultural competence of specialised secondary school students (based on the material of foreign language teaching)]. Сandidate’s thesis. Cheboksary, Russia (rus).

 Hryshkova, R. O. (2007). Formuvannia inshomovnoi sotsiokulturnoi kompetentsii studentiv nefilolohichnykh spetsialnostei [Formation of students’-nonphilologists foreign sociocultural competence]. Mykolaiv, Ukraine: Publishing house of MSHU named after Petro Mohyla (ukr).

 Korostіl, L. A. (2009). Samoosvіta osobistostі jak socіal’ne ta pedahohіchne javishhe [Personality’s self-education as a social and pedagogical phenomenon]. Pedahohichni nauky, 1, 138–145 (ukr).

 Kratkij slovar po sociologii [Concise Dictionary in Psychology] (1989). Moscow, Russia: Politizdat (rus).

 Kushnir, I. M. (2012). Formuvannia sotsiokulturnoi kompetentnosti inozemnykh studentiv u protsesi navchannia rosiiskoi movy [Formation of foreign students’ sociocultural competence in the course of Russian language learning]. Сandidate’s thesis. Kherson, Ukraine (ukr).

 Novyi tlumachnyi slovnyk ukrainskoi movy [New Definition Dictionary of the Ukrainian Language]. (2001). Kyiv, Ukraine: Akonit. Vol. 2. (rus).

 Ozhegov, S. I. (2006). Tolkovyj slovar russkogo jazyka [Russian Definition Dictionary]. Moscow, Russia: ITI Tehnologii (rus).

 Sadchikova, Ja. V. (2009). Formirovanie mezhkul’turnoj kompetentnosti studentov v processe obuchenija inostrannomu jazyku v tehnicheskom vuze [Formation of students’ intercultural competence in the course of foreign language learning at technical university]. Сandidate’s thesis. Penza, Russia (rus).

 Sergeeva, I. V. (2011). Multikulturnoe vospitanie studentov vuza v processe obuchenija inostrannomu jazyku [University students’ multicultural education in the course of foreign language learning]. Сandidate’s thesis. Cheboksary, Russia (rus).

 Slovar russkogo jazyka [Russian dictionary] (1981). Moscow, Russia: Russkij jazyk (rus).

 Slovnyk ukrainskoi movy [A Dictionary of the Ukrainian Language ] (1976). Kyiv, Ukraine: Naukova dumka. Vol. 7 (ukr).

 Suchasnyi slovnyk inshomovnykh sliv [Modern Dictionary of Foreign Words] (2007). Kharkiv, Ukraine: TORSING-PLUS (ukr.)

 Maiier, N. (2017). The methodological training of future university teachers to implement intercultural foreign language education: the competency-based approach. Advanced education, 8, 4–9. doi: 10.20535/2410-8286.101358 (eng).



Full Text: PDF(ukr)