Ushakov A. SPIRITUALIZED MAN OF CULTURE IMAGE UPBRINGING IN THE INFORMATION AGE

Ushakov Artem, PhD (Pedagogics), Associate Professor, Postdoctoral Student, Volodymyr Dahl East Ukrainian National University, 59-a Central Pr., 93400 Severodonetsk, Ukraine, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Abstract

The present article aims to identify the ideological component of the man of culture spiritualized image, deprived of any dubious biological load, taking into account such concepts as «man of culture», «spirituality», «worldview, image», «man of culture image». A special attention is paid to giving a general definition of man of culture spiritualized image. Using the term «man of culture spiritualized image», the author speaks of the man of culture as of a generalized type of the carrier of culture. Society desires this type of man, who transmits the best examples of it, serves it by his activity, and preserves it. By doing this, he makes all this real according to the principles of humanism and tolerance towards other cultures. Then, it is necessary to speak not only about the upbringing of man of culture, as a person who creates culture, who is its carrier, transmitter and custodian, that is, a person whose foundation is culture-genic creativity, but also about creating conditions for the transition of human culture formed in the semiosphere into a higher, ethical sphere. In this sphere, by adjusting to the ethical ideal, he can acquire a worldview through which he will be able to translate information from the semiotic form (the form of meanings) into the form of knowledge. In order to move to the level of the ethical sphere, it is required to be tuned for the perception of the ideal (creative). By doing this, the transition from the worldview to the outlook occurs – that is, from the adoption of information on the basis of biological, mechanical-cognitive and automatically-semiotic perception of signals to the analysis of this information in the context of the ethical ideal. It is in this way that the man of culture can acquire his spiritual image.

Prospects for further research consist in the application of the obtained results to the development of a topic related to the consideration of «man of culture spiritualized image» concept in the context of the educational process at a university level.

Key words: culture;  man of culture; man of culture spiritualized image;  spirituality;  worldview.

References

Budjko, M., Trojicjka, O. (2014). Vykhovannja ljudyny kuljtury: Kuljturologhichni intenciji novoji osvitnjoji metodologhiji [Man of culture upbringing: Culturological intentions of a new educational methodology]. Versus, 1 (3), 41–47 (ukr).

Vernadskij, V. I. (1989). Biosfera i noosfera [Biosphere and Noosphere]. Moscow, Russia: Nauka (rus).

Kulturologicheskij slovar [Culturological Dictionary]. Retrieved from sbiblio.com/biblio/content.aspx?dictid= 5&worded=72937 (rus).

Lotman, Ju. M. (1996). Vnutri mysljashhih mirov. Chelovek – tekst – semiosfera – istorija[Inside thinking worlds. Man – text – semiosphere – history]. Moscow, Russia: Jazyki russkoj kultury (rus).

Lotman, Ju. M. (2000). Semiosfera [Semiosphere]. Saint-Petersburg, Russia: Iskusstvo-SPb http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2013.41.2-3.11 (rus).

Romah, O. V. (2007). «Chelovek kultury» v socialnom prostranstve [Man of culture in social area]. Analitika kulturologii, 7. Retrieved from http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/chelovek-kultury-vsotsialnom-prostranstve (rus).

Simbirceva, N. A. (2016). «Kod kultury» kak kulturologicheskaja kategorija [Culture code as a culturological category]. Problemy kulturologii, 1, 157–167 (rus). 

Tolstoj, N. I., Tolstaja S. M. (1995). O Slovare «Slavjanskie drevnosti». Slavjanskie drevnosti : jetnolingvisticheskij slovar [About Slav antiquities dictionary: ethnolinguistic dictionary]. Moscow, Russia: Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija (rus).

Fuko, M. (1977). Slova i veshhi. Arheologija gumanitarnyh nauk [Words and things. Archeology of the humanities]. Moscow, Russia: Progress (rus). 

Fukujama, F. (1990). Konec istorii? [History end?]. Voprosy  filosofii, 3, 134–148 (rus).

Khantinghton, S. (1993). Zitknennja cyvilizacij [Civilizations Collision]. Retrieved from http://old.russ.ru/politics/20121576-han.html (ukr).

Shvejcer, A. (1973). Kultura i jetika [Culture and ethics]. Moscow, Russia: Progress (rus).

Shevchenko, G. P. (2015). Odukhotvorenyj obraz ljudyny kuljtury ХХІ stolittja: proces jogho vykhovannja u vyshhij shkoli [Spiritualized Image Of Man Of Culture Of The XХІ Century: Process Of Its Upbringing In The Higher School]. Dukhovnistj osobystosti: metodologhija, teorija i praktyka, 5, 213–225 (ukr).

Еko, U. (1998). Otsutstvujushhaja struktura. Vvedenie v semiologiju [Absent structure. Introduction to semiology]. Saint-Petersburg, Russia : TOO TK «Petropolis» (rus).



Full Text: PDF (ukr)