Synekop O. LEARNER AND ACTIVITY CENTERED APPROACH INENGLISH DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION OF FUTURE IT-SPECIALISTS 

Synekop Oksana, PhD, Assistant Professor of Department of English for Engineering, Faculty of Linguistics, National Technical University of Ukraine «Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute», 37 Peremohy Ave., 03056 Kyiv, Ukraine, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

https://doi.org/10.28925/2078-1687.2017.3.7177

 Abstract 

Formation of the integrated personality of the future specialist in the field of information technologies and the special organization of English teaching-learning process based on the professional realities are the basis of the learner and activity approach in differentiated instruction of non-linguistic higher educational institution. The author analyzes the individual psychological features of the student, which are strengthened by a certain learning style (sensory modality, type of thinking, psychotype, the way of decision making, the way of managing ideas, the approach to the organization of learning activity), the language proficiency level, the autonomy level. Thinking, memory, perception, attention and interests of the future specialists in the field of information technologies are characterized. Foreign-language activity, which is built on professional(project, technological, organizational and managerical, research) one, is characterized.Such an activity creates minimum conditions for reflecting  professional reality and possibility for foreign language communication of the future specialist in the field of information technologies. Foreign-language activity is considered as a two-way and interconnected process of learning, based on the students mastery of English for specific purposes in accordance with a certain level of command of a foreign language and study, which, on the other hand, is carried out by a teacher. One of the components of foreign language activity is reflection. It combines analysis-assessment, comprehension of difficulties and rethinking-correction. According to this research the individual and group reflection has been outlined.
Keywords:  English teaching;  differentiated instruction;  future specialists in the field of information technologies;  learner and activity centered approach;  reflection.

References
Abramova, G. S. (1999). Vozrastnaja psihologija [AgePsychology]. Moscow, Russian Federation: Izdatel’skij centr «Akademija» (rus).
Anan’ev, B. G. (1980). Izbrannye psihologicheskie trudy v dvuh tomah [Selected psychological works in two volumes]. Moscow, Russian Federation: «Pedagogika» (rus).
Gal’skova, N. D., & Gez, N. I. (2004). Teorija obuchenija inostrannym jazykam: Lingvodidaktika i metodika [Theory of Foreign Language Teaching: Linguodidactics and Methodology]. Moscow, Russian Federation: Izdatel’skij centr «Akademija» (rus).
Zadorozhna, I. P. (2012). Teoretyko-metodychni zasady orghanizaciji samostijnoji roboty majbutnikh uchyteliv z ovolodinnja anghlomovnoju komunikatyvnoju kompetencijeju [Theoretical and methodical principles of organization of independent work of future teachers on mastering English-language communicative competence]. Doctor’s thesis. Kyiv, Ukraine (ukr).
Zeer, Je. F. (2013). Psihologija professionalnogo obrazovanija [Psychology of vocational education]. Moscow, Russian Federation: Izdatel’skij centr «Akademija» (rus).
Zimnjaja, I. A. (2003). Pedagogicheskaja psihologija [Pedagogical psychology]. Moscow, Russian Federation: «Logos» (rus).
Kudrjavcev, T. V. (1975). Psihologija tehnicheskogo myshlenija. (Process i sposoby reshenija tehnicheskih zadach) [Psychology of technical thinking. (The process and methods of solving technical problems)]. Moscow, Russian Federation: «Pedagogika» (rus).
Kuljutkin, Ju. N., & Mushtavinskaja, I. V. (2002). Obrazovatelnye tehnologii i pedagogicheskaja refleksija [Educational Technologies and Pedagogical Reflection]. Sankt-Peterburg, Russian Federation: «SPBGUPM» (rus).
Koljada, M. Gh. (2013). Metodyka rishennja zadach na osnovi kombinatorno-loghichnogho myslennja [Methodology of solving problems on the basis of combinatorial-logical thinking]. Naukovi praci Vyščoho navčaĺnoho zakladu «Donećký nacionaĺný techničný universytet». Ser.: Pedahohika, psycholohija i sociolohija. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Npdntu_pps_2013_2_27 (ukr).
Orel, E. A. (2007). Diagnostika osobennostej myslitelnoj dejatelnosti specialistov v oblasti informacionnyh tehnologij (programmistov) [Diagnostics features of mental activity of specialists in the field of information technology (programmers)]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Moscow, Russian Federation (rus).
Osvitnjo-profesijna proghrama pershogho (bakalavrsjkogho) rivenja vyshhoji osvity stupenja «bakalavr». Ghaluzj znanj: 12 Informacijni tekhnologhiji. Specialjnistj: 125 Kiberbezpeka. Specializacija: Matematychni metody kiberbezpeky [Educational and professional program of the first (Bachelor) level of higher education of the «Bachelor» degree. Branch of knowledge: 12 Information technologies. Specialty: 125 Cybersecurity. Specialization: Mathematical Methods of Cybersecurity]. (2016). Kyiv, Ukraine: NTUU «KPI» (ukr).
Putevoditel po metodologii Organizacii, Rukovodstva i Upravlenija: Hrestomatija po rabotam G. P. Shhedrovickogo[Guide to the methodology of the Organization, Management and Control: Readings on the work of G. P. Schedrovitskogo] (2003). Moscow, Russian Federation: Delo (rus).
Savchenko, O. Ja. (2004). Uminnja vchytysja jak kljuchova kompetentnistj zaghaljnoji serednjoji osvity. [Ability to learn as the key competence of general secondary education]. Kyiv, Ukraine: «K.I.S.» (ukr).
Stepanov, S. Ju., & Semenov, I. N. (1985). Psihologija refleksii: problemy i issledovanija [Psychology of Reflection: Problems and Research]. Voprosy psihologii, 3, 31−40 (rus).
Synekop, O. S. (2015). Osobystisnyj komponent v osobystisno-dijaljnisnomu pidkhodi u navchanni anghlijsjkoji movy studentiv tekhnichnykh specialjnostej zasobamy mizhdyscyplinarnykh zv’jazkiv [The personal component in the learner centered approach in teaching English language students of technical specialties by means of interdisciplinarity]. Naukovi zapysky: zbirnyk naukovych statej, SXXVI (126), 132−138 (ukr).
Panina, T. S., & Vavilova, L. N. (2006). Sovremennye sposoby aktivizacii obuchenija [Modern ways of active learning]. Moscow, Russian Federation: Izdatel’skij centr «Akademija» (rus).
Jakimanskaja, I. S. (1996). Lichnostno-orientirovannoe obuchenie v sovremennoj shkole [Learner-oriented learning in a modern school]. Moscow, Russian Federation: «Sentjabr’» (rus).
Cardella, M. (2007). Engineering Students’ Mathematical Thinking: In the Wild and with a Lab-based Task. Retrieved from https://iths.pure.elsevier.com/en/ publications/engineering-students-mathematical-thinking-in-the-wild-and-with-a (eng).
Lompsher, J. (1995). Unterschiedliche Lehrstrategien und ihre Konsequenzen. Lerntheorie. Tätigkeitstheorie. Fremdsprachenunterricht; Hrsg. S. Ehlers. München, Germany (ger).
Matukhin, D., & Bolgova, D. (2015). Learner-centered Approach in Teaching Foreign Language: Psychological and Pedagogical Conditions. Procedia − Social and Behavioral Sciences, 206, 17 Oct., 148–155. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.044 (eng).
Niewoehner, R. J. (2006). A Critical Thinking Model for Engineering. Proceedings of the 2nd International CDIO Conference. Linkoping University. Linkoping, Sweden, 1−12 (eng).
Schneier, B. (2003). Airplane Hackers. IEEE Security & Privacy, 1, № 6, Nov/Dec., 91−92 (eng).


Full Text: PDF (ukr)