Zamkova N., Voinarovska N. A.LUKE AND P.FREEBODY’S PEDAGOGICAL MODEL OF EDUCATING CRITICAL LITERACY OF FUTURE INTERPRETERS: APPLICATION EXPERIENCE WITHIN DOMESTIC PEDAGOGICAL PRACTICE

Zamkova Natalia, Doctor of Philosophic Sciences, Associate Professor, Director of the Institute, Vinnytsia Institute of Trade and Economics of Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics, 87 Soborna Str., 21050 Vinnytsia, Ukraine,  This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Voinarovska Natalya, PhD, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Foreign Philology and Translation, Vinnytsia Institute of Trade and Economics of Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics, 87 Soborna Str., 21050 Vinnytsia, Ukraine,  This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

https://doi.org/10.28925/2078-1687.2017.2.9599

Abstract

Current paper analyzes practical implications of reader roles of Luke and Freebodys Four Resources Model of critical literacy teaching in the process of training future interpreters in Ukrainian higher educational institutions. Two resources (code-breaking and meaning making) have been successfully implemented into the classic literature teaching content for Bachelors degree students. Theoretical background, functions, and aim of these two roles have been examined. Stages of the practical classes organization for the most fruitful students code-breaking have been shown. Intertextual and social-cultural factors of the practical meaning-making process have been identified. Besides, the compulsory interconnection between current two resources has been proved.

Keywords:  critical literacy;  foreign languages competence;  higher education;  interpreters training;  literacy education;  semantic competence;  text code-breaking.

References

  1. Christie F., Misson R. (1998). Literacy and Schooling. London: Routledge, 192, ISBN:9780415170178, DOI:10.4324/9780203019559 (eng).
  2. Ho C. M., Leong A. P., Anderson K. T. (2011). Transforming Literacy and Language: Multimodality and Literacy in the New Media Age. Bloomsbury Academic, 244 , ISBN:978-1-4411-2391-6, DOI:10.5040/9781474212014 (eng).
  3. Larson J., Marsh J. (2013). The SAGE Handbook of Early Childhood Literacy. London: SAGE Publications Ltd., 704, DOI:10.4135/9781446247518 (eng).
  4. Larson J., Marsh J. (2015). Making Literacy Real: Theories and Practices for Learning and Teaching. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, 190, DOI:10.4135/9781473910508 (eng).
  5. Melda N. Y. (2016). Handbook of Research on Media Literacy in the Digital Age. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 532, DOI:10.4018/978-1-4666-9667-9 (eng).
  6. Moss B., Lapp D., Grant M., Johnson K. (2015). A close look at Close Reading: Teaching Students to Analyze Complex Texts. Alexandria, United States: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development, 208 (eng).
  7. Nokes J.D. (2013). Building Students’ Historical Literacies: Learning to Read and Reasons with Historical Texts and Evidence. New York, NY: Routledge, 220, DOI:10.7202/1029434ar (eng).
  8. Strop M., Carlson J. (2010). Multimedia Texts Set: Changing the Shape of Engagement and Learning. Winnipeg, Canada: Portage & Main Press, 177 (eng).
  9. Tompkins G., Campbell R., Green D., Smith C. (2014). Literacy for the 21st Century. New York: Pearson, 504 (eng).

 
Full Text: PDF (eng)