Radchuk H. EDUCATIONAL DIALOGUE AS AN INNOVATIVE AND HUMANITARIAN TECHNOLOGY FOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF PERSONALITY IN HIGHER EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS
 
Radchuk Halyna, Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Head of Practical Psychology Department, Volodymyr Hnatiuk Ternopil National Pedagogic University, 2 Kryvonosa Str., 46027 Ternopil, Ukraine, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

https://doi.org/10.28925/2078-1687.2017.1.15

Abstract

The article investigates the essential aspects of a dialogue with a purpose of further implementation it in higher education teaching practice. The author argues that educational dialogues can be regarded as a humanitarian technology that integrates cultural, axiological, existential, phenomenological ideas about learning on value-semantic level and coherent professional development of an individual in university environment. Educational dialogue is analyzed as a form of active learning, which aims at mastering of professional knowledge at a value-semantic level, and also as a form of communication, which provides environment for personality development, giving it psychological support, and social interaction skills.

It is proven that the deployment of educational dialogue at formal, content and value-semantic levels involves development of teacher and student capabilities for conducting a dialogue, and training material that is suitable for teaching in a dialogue format.

The author identifies the following conditions for implementation of educational dialogue in higher education 1) development of readiness for a dialogue in teachers both on personal and professional levels; 2) formation of dialogue culture in students; 3) development of self-reflection processes in students; 4) student mastering the skills for organizing joint activities; 5) formation of subjective student positions in educational process; 6) modeling of cooperation and joint creative activities, that serve as a model of future professional partner communication; 7) creating educational situations as close to the life situations as possible within the process of meaningful learning cooperation; 8) bringing training content closer to the realities of future profession.

Keywords:  dialogic trainingcontent;  dialogue;  educational dialogue;  student dialogue capacities;  teacher dialogue capacities.

References

1.     Belova S. V. (1995). Funktsii uchebnoho dialoha v usvoenii tsennosto-smyslovoho soderzhanyya humanytarnykh predmetov [Functions of educational dialogues in acquisition of value and sense content of humanitarian subjects]: Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Volhohrad, 18 (rus).

2.     Halitskikh E. O. (2004). Dyaloh v obrazovanii kak sposob stanovleniya tolerantnosti [Dialogue in education as a means for tolerance development]. M.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 240 (rus).

3.     Dʹyakonov H. V. (2007). Osnovy dialogicheskoho podkhoda v psikholohycheskoy nauke i praktike [Foundations of dialogical approach in psychological science and practice]. Kirovohrad: RYO V. Vynnychenko KHPU, 847 (rus).

4.     Kozina L. M. (2014). Mezhkulʹturnyy dialoh kak pedahohicheskoe sredstvo vospitaniya polykulʹturnosti [Intercultural dialogue as a pedagogical means for education of multiculturalism]. Education and Science, 79-92, DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2014-3-79-92 (rus).

5.     Professionalʹnaya kukhnia trenera (iz opyta neformalʹnoho obrazovanyya v tretʹem sektore) [Professional trainer’s kitchen (from the experience of informal education in the third sector)] (2003). E. Karpievich, V. Velichko (Ed.). SPb.: «Nevskyy prostor», 256 (rus).

6.     Prutchenkov A. S. (1995). Trudnoe voskhozhdenie k sebe. Metodicheskie razrabotki i stsenarii zaniatiy sotsyalʹno-psikhologicheskikh treningov [Difficult ascent to self. Methodological aids and scenarios for social psychological training]. M.: Rospedagenstvo, 140 (rus).

7.     Savicheva N. H. (2007). Obrazovatelʹno-vospytatelʹnoe prostranstvo kak synerhiynaya kommunikatsiya [Educational environment as synergetic communication]. M.: Progres-Traditsyya, 557-565 (rus).

8.     Senʹko Yu. V. (2000). Gumanitarnye osnovy pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya: Kurs lektsyy [Humanitarian basics of pedagogical education: Lectures]. M.: Priniting center «Akademia», 240 (rus).

9.     Serikov V. V. (1999). Obrazovanie i lichnost. Teoriya i praktika proektirovaniya pedagogicheskikh sistem [Education and personality. Theory and practice of pedagogical system design]. M., 272 (rus).

10.   Shatin Yu. V. (1996). Fenomenologiya obrazovaniya i kommunykativnaya strategiya obucheniya [Phenomenology of education and communication strategy of learning]. Dyskurs, 1, 23-29 (rus).

11.   Yatsenko T. S. (2004). Teoriya i praktyka grupovoyi psykhokorektsiyi: Aktyvne sotsialno-psykholohichne navchannya [Theory and practice of group psychocorrection: Active social and psychological training]. K.: Vyshcha shkola, 679 (ukr).

Full Text: PDF (ukr)