Scientific journal The Pedagogical Process: Theory and Practice

Abstract 

The article shows the essence of interpersonal conflicts. This conflict considered as problematic for its carrier state that: 1) is extremely important, and certainly associated with the choice between alternatives equal in strength for him (even if the alternatives are not understood); 2) subjectively experienced as a insoluble problem and so is extremely, uncomfortable, tense, frustration and painful feelings about their inferiority; 3) tends to deepen, strengthening, totalization andno adaptivecourse. Analyzed and summarized a some number of scientific concepts about interpersonal conflicts and understanding of its basic type described in professional literature. The features of the subject of interpersonal conflict in conflictology, total, practical and clinical psychology are shown and the model of interdisciplinary study this conflicts are proposed. The attention to constructive (adaptive) and unconstructive (no adaptive) intrapersonal conflicts is accented. The features of intrapersonal conflicts in the area of the individual motivation are shown. Particular attention is paid to motivating interpersonal conflicts with non-adaptive and destructive forms of current. Features of no adaptive motivational conflict and possible consequences of these conflicts for intrapersonal and interpersonal (social) life of a person are shown.

Keywords:  criteria for non-adaptive conflict;  interdisciplinary subject of conflict;  intrapersonal conflict;  intrapersonal reality;  non-adaptive motivational conflict.

References

1. Abul'hanova-Slavskaja K. A. (1991). Strategija zhizni [Strategy of life]. M.: Mysl', 302 (rus).
2. Adler A. (1997). Ponjat' prirodu cheloveka [Understand the nature of man]. SPb.: Akademicheskij prospekt, 256 (rus).
3. Asadzhioli R. (1994). Psihosintez: Teorija i praktika [Psychosynthesis: Theory and Practice]. M.: REFL-book, 314 (rus).
4. Вaumann U., Perre M. (2004). Klinicheskaya psihologiya [Clinical psychology]. SPb: Rech, 960 (rus).
5. Bozhovich L. I. (1995). Problemy formirovanija lichnosti [Problems of personality formation]. M.: NPO MODJeK, 352 (rus).
6. Vasiljuk F. E. (1984). Psihologija perezhivanija. Analiz preodolenija kriticheskih situacij [Psychology of experience. Analysis of overcoming critical situations]. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 204 (rus).
7. Vasiutynskyi V. O. (2005). Interaktsiina psykholohiia vlady [Psychology and interactive power]. K.: KSU, 492 (ukr).
8. Kochubeinyk O. M. (2015). Zmkneni prostory: symptomy nedialohichnoho dyskursu [Zmkneni spaces: Symptoms nedialohichnoho discourse]. Pedahohichnyi protses: teoriia i praktyka, 3-4 (48-49), 59-64 (ukr).
9. Levin K. (2000). Teorija polja v social'nyh naukah [Field Theory in Social Sciences]. SPb.: Sensor, 368 (rus).
10. Leont'ev D. A. (2003). Psihologija smysla: priroda, stroenie i dinamika smyslovoj real'nosti [Psychology of meaning: nature, structure and dynamics of the semantic reality]. M.: Smysl, 486 (rus).
11. Maslou A. (2011). Dal'nie predely chelovecheskoj psihiki [The Far Limits of the Human Psyche]. SPb.: Izd-vo «Evrazija», 448 (rus).
12. Mjasishhev V. M. (1995). Psihologija otnoshenij. Izbrannye psihologicheskie trudy [Psychology of relations. Selected psychological works]. M.; Voronezh: Institut prakticheskoj psihologii, 356 (rus).
13. Tytarenko T. M. (2003). Zhyttjevyj svit osobystosti: u mezhakh i za mezhamy budennosti [Life world of personality: inside and outside the ordinary]. K.: Lybidj, 376 (ukr).
14. Thostov A. Sh. (1994). Topologiya sub'ekta (opyit fenomenologicheskogo issledovaniya) [The topology of the subject (the experience of phenomenological research)]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14. Psihologiya, 3-13 (rus).
15. Frejd Z. (1997). Psihopatologija obydennoj zhizni [Psychopathology of everyday life]. M.: Aletejja, 256 (rus).
16. Fromm Je. (1992). Dusha cheloveka [The soul of man]. M.: Respublika, 430 (rus).
17. Jerikson Je. (1996). Identichnost': junost' i krizis [Identity: youth and crisis]. M.: Progress, 344 (rus).
18. Jung K. G. (1991). Arhetip i simvol [Archetype and symbol]. M.: Renessans, 304 (rus).