Kapidinova S., RELATIONS AND SOCIAL
DISTANCE AS INDICATORS OF
INTERETHNIC TOLERANCE OF
STUDENTS 

Kapidinova S., PhD student, Institute of Social and Political Psychology, 
lecturer in applied psychology CrimeanIndustrial-Pedagogical University 

Abstract 

The article presents the results of an empirical research of students' ideas about the phenomenon of tolerance as a tool of social communication. It is shown that the students' inter-ethnic tolerance is represented in three forms: as declared, as demonstrated, as true tolerance and the indexes of distance between declared tolerance and true tolerance of pedagogical specialties are significantly bigger than these indexes of students of psychology and students of engineer specialties.An ethnic identity and value orientations of students as indicators of culture of interethnic relations are analyzes. The article is focused on two social-psychological phenomena – «relation» and «social distance», which are regarded as indicators of the culture of interethnic relations. On the basis of empirical studies the characteristics of humanist and engineering students' attitudes towards representatives of other cultures and ethnic groups have been analyzed, as well as their typical attitudes on perception of these representatives and the interaction with them. The attitudes of students are revealed, explicable in situations of interactive communication. The indexes of social distance are given, built by students in relation to the representatives of Ukrainian, Russian, Crimean Tatar, European and American ethnic cultures.

Keywords:
 interethnic communication;  social distance;  social settings;  the culture of interethnic relations;  tolerance;  tolerant / intolerant behaviour.
 
References
  1. Аmy L. Reynolds, Amy L., Constantine Madonna G. (2007). Cultural Adjustment Difficulties and Career Development of International College Students. Journal of Career Assessment 08/2007; 15(3). Doi:10.1177/1069072707301218 (eng).
  2. Вogardus E. S. (1933). A Social Distance Scale. Sociology and Social Research University of Southern California. Vol. 17, P. 265-271 (eng).
  3. BojkoV. V. Jenergija jemocij v obshhenii : vzgljad na sebja i na drugih [The energy of emotions in communication: a look at yourself and others] / V. V. Bojko. – M. : Filin, 1996. – 472 s. (rus).
  4. Кorostelina K. V. Psihodiagnostika mezhjetnicheskih otnoshenij : opyt jempiricheskogo issledovanija (na primere krymsko-tatarskogo i slavjanskogo jetnosov) [Psychodiagnostics interethnic relations: Empirical studies (for example, the Crimean Tatar and Slavic ethnic groups)] / K. V. Korostelina.– Simferopol': SGU, 1998. – 138 s. (rus).
  5. Pochebut L. G.Vzaimoponimanie kul'tur : metodologija i metody jetnicheskoj i kross-kul'turnoj psihologii. Psihologija mezhjetnicheskoj tolerantnosti : ucheb. posob [Mutual understanding of cultures: the methodology and techniques of ethnic and cross-cultural psychology. Psychology of interethnic tolerance: Proc. Collec] / L. G. Pochebut. – SPb. : Piter, 2005. – 235 s. (rus).
  6. Psihologicheskaja pomoshh' migrantam: travma, smena kul'tury, krizis identichnosti[Psychological assistance to migrants: trauma, change in the culture, identity crisis] / Pod red. G.U.Soldatovoj, L. A. Shajgerovoj. – M.: Smysl, 2002. – 479 s. (rus).
  7. Soldatova G. U. Psihologija mezhjetnicheskoj naprjazhennosti [Psychology of ethnic tensions] / G. U. Soldatova. – M.: Smysl, 1998. – 387 s. (rus).
   Full Text: PDF (ukr)